← back to the ledger
Aged Care Act 2024 - ss 582-583, including s 583(6)
These are laws that authorise a computer program to make a decision. This is not a claim that any decision was wrong, that any agency currently automates anything, or how any agency uses the power if it does. Authorisation is not use.
Provision text
582 Automation of administrative action
(1) The System Governor may, in writing, arrange for the use, under
the System Governor’s oversight, of computer programs to take
administrative action that must be taken by the System Governor
under this Act.
(2) Administrative action is any of the following:
(a) making, or refusing or failing to make, a decision under a
provision mentioned in subsection (2A);
(b) exercising, or refusing or failing to exercise, a power under a
provision mentioned in subsection (2A);
(c) performing, or refusing or failing to perform, a function or
duty under a provision mentioned in subsection (2A);
(d) doing, or refusing or failing to do, anything (including giving
a notice) related to making a decision, exercising a power or
performing a function or duty under a provision mentioned in
subsection (2A).
(2A) For the purposes of subsection (2), the provisions are the following
provisions of this Act:
(a) subsection 78(1) (which deals with classification levels);
(b) subsection 86(1) (which deals with priority category
decisions);
(c) subsection 92(1) (which deals with allocation of places to
individuals);
(d) subsection 93(1) (which deals with deciding the order of
allocation of places to individuals);
(e) Parts 2 to 5 of Chapter 4 (which deal with funding of aged
care services);
(f) section 541 (which deals with star ratings);
(g) a provision of this Act prescribed by the rules.
System Governor is treated as having taken administrative action
(3) Administrative action taken by the operation of a computer
program under an arrangement under subsection (1) is treated, for
all purposes, as administrative action taken by the System
Governor.
Substituted actions
(4) The System Governor may take administrative action (the
substituted action) in substitution for administrative action the
System Governor is treated as having taken under subsection (3) if
the System Governor is satisfied that the administrative action
taken by the operation of the computer program is not correct.
(5) The substituted action takes effect on:
(a) if the System Governor specifies the day on which the
substituted action takes effect (which may be earlier than the
day the substituted action is taken)—that specified day; or
(b) otherwise—the day of the administrative action taken by the
operation of the computer program.
(5A) The day specified under paragraph (5)(a) may be earlier than the
day the substituted action is taken, but not earlier than the day of
the administrative action taken by the operation of the computer
program.
System Governor may still take administrative action
(5B) An arrangement under subsection (1) does not prevent the System
Governor from taking administrative action under the provisions
referred to in subsection (2A).
Substituted action does not limit right to review or reconsideration
of administrative action
(6) Subsection (4) does not limit any other provision of this Act that
provides for the review or reconsideration of an administrative
action.
Arrangement not a legislative instrument
(7) An arrangement under subsection (1) is not a legislative
instrument.
583 Oversight and safeguards for automation of administrative
action
System Governor to ensure administrative action is action that
could be validly taken
(1) The System Governor must take all reasonable steps to ensure that
administrative action taken by the operation of a computer program
under an arrangement under subsection 582(1) is administrative
action that the System Governor could validly take under this Act.
(2) Without limiting subsection (1), the System Governor must do the
things (if any) prescribed by the rules for the purposes of this
subsection.
Note:
Administrative action may still be invalid even if subsections (1) and
(2) are complied with.
(3) A failure to comply with subsection (1) or (2) does not affect the
validity of the administrative action taken by the operation of a
computer program under an arrangement under subsection 582(1).
Notice to entities of substituted decisions
(4) If, under subsection 582(4), the System Governor makes a decision
in substitution for a decision the System Governor is treated as
having taken under subsection 582(3), the System Governor must,
within 14 days of the making of the substituted decision, give the
entity that is the subject of the substituted decision written notice
of the substituted decision.
(5) The notice must include how the entity may apply for
reconsideration of the substituted decision.
(5A) A failure to comply with subsection (4) or (5) does not affect the
validity of the substituted decision.
Publication
(6) If the System Governor makes an arrangement under
subsection 582(1) in relation to particular provisions of this Act,
the System Governor must cause a statement to be published on the
Department’s website:
(a) to the effect that the System Governor has made such an
arrangement; and
(b) setting out those particular provisions.
Details in annual report
(7) The System Governor, when preparing the Department’s annual
report under section 46 of the Public Governance, Performance
and Accountability Act 2013 for a period, must include the
following information in that report:
(a) the total number of substituted actions taken by the System
Governor under subsection 582(4) of this Act in that period;
(b) the kinds of substituted actions so taken;
(c) the kinds of administrative action taken by the operation of
the computer program that the System Governor was
satisfied were not correct.
(8) The System Governor may also include in the report any other
information (other than personal information within the meaning of
the Privacy Act 1988) about the operation of section 582 and this
section in that period that the System Governor considers
appropriate.
Details
Disclosure surface: Surface recorded (unverified) - AI transparency statement
This records only whether an agency-published ADM transparency surface was found and recorded; it is not a claim about how, or whether, the agency uses the statutory power above.
Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 18 July 2026. For the latest information... go to legislation.gov.au Licence: CC BY 4.0 (Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International). This is an archived copy and is not an authorised version of the legislation (Legislation Act 2003 Part 3).